Preparing for IB MYP External Moderation

7 min read

Introduction

The IB Middle Years Programme (MYP) is recognized worldwide for its high academic standards and commitment to consistent, fair evaluation. One key process that ensures this consistency is external moderation — the IB’s way of checking that schools assess students accurately according to global standards.

But what does moderation actually involve? And how can teachers and students prepare effectively? This guide breaks down how MYP external moderation works, why it matters, and what best practices schools should follow to ensure success and integrity in the assessment process.

What Is IB MYP External Moderation?

External moderation is the process by which the International Baccalaureate Organization (IBO) reviews samples of student work from schools to verify that teachers’ grading aligns with IB assessment standards.

It applies primarily to internally assessed subjects, meaning that while teachers mark the work, the IB checks a sample to confirm that marking is fair and accurate across all schools globally.

This process maintains academic credibility, ensuring that an MYP grade in one country holds the same value as the same grade elsewhere.

Why Moderation Matters

Moderation is essential because it:

  • Ensures fairness — All students are evaluated according to the same international criteria.
  • Maintains IB quality — It safeguards the integrity and reputation of the IB qualification.
  • Supports teacher development — Feedback from IB moderators helps educators refine assessment practices.
  • Validates final results — It ensures that MYP grades used for certification or reporting are accurate and credible.

In short, moderation is not about catching mistakes — it’s about guaranteeing consistency and helping schools improve.

How the Moderation Process Works

Here’s a step-by-step overview of how moderation is conducted in the MYP:

1. Teachers Assess Student Work Internally

Teachers mark student tasks using IB criteria-based rubrics (0–8 per criterion). Assessments include written assignments, lab reports, design portfolios, or performances — depending on the subject.

2. Schools Select Samples

Each school submits a representative sample of student work for each subject. Typically, this includes examples from across the grade range (high, medium, and low achievement).

3. Submission to the IB

Samples are uploaded digitally to the IB’s secure platform. Along with student work, teachers include rationales explaining how they applied criteria and awarded marks.

4. External Moderators Review Samples

Experienced IB moderators — trained and appointed by the IBO — review the work and compare teacher marks to the official standards.

5. Adjustments and Feedback

If discrepancies are found, the IB may adjust grades to reflect accurate standards. Schools receive a moderation report highlighting strengths, consistency, and areas for improvement.

What Is Moderated

Moderation typically applies to internal assessments across the following subjects:

  • Language and Literature
  • Language Acquisition
  • Individuals and Societies
  • Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Arts
  • Physical and Health Education
  • Design

Each subject’s internal work is moderated against the IB’s assessment criteria to ensure accuracy and fairness.

Best Practices for Teachers

1. Align Assessment Tasks with IB Criteria

Every task should directly match one or more IB assessment criteria (A–D). Teachers should avoid tasks that test skills not linked to the official objectives.

2. Use Standardization Sessions

Departments should regularly standardize marking by reviewing and comparing each other’s scoring using sample work. This helps ensure consistency before submitting grades for moderation.

3. Keep Detailed Records

Maintain documentation of feedback, rubrics, and task instructions. Moderators often review this to understand how teachers applied criteria.

4. Analyze Past Moderation Feedback

Each school receives feedback after moderation. Reviewing these reports helps refine future assessment practices and improve reliability.

5. Focus on Clear Evidence

Encourage students to make their learning visible — for example, showing reasoning in math solutions or reflections in design journals. Strong evidence supports accurate moderation.

Tips for Students

1. Follow Task Criteria Carefully
Every MYP task is scored against specific criteria. Students should review the rubric before starting, ensuring their work addresses each strand clearly.

2. Reflect and Revise
Encourage reflection as part of the process. Students should self-assess using the same rubrics to identify areas for improvement before submission.

3. Present Work Professionally
Clarity matters — whether through organization, visuals, or structure. Moderators should easily understand how the student met each criterion.

4. Take Ownership
Students who understand how their work is assessed are more confident and motivated to meet expectations — a core goal of the IB philosophy.

Common Challenges in Moderation

  • Over-marking or under-marking: Teachers may interpret criteria too generously or strictly.
  • Inconsistent feedback: Lack of alignment between comments and assigned levels.
  • Incomplete evidence: Missing reflections or data can weaken the validity of a submission.

Schools can avoid these issues by conducting pre-moderation reviews, ensuring every submission fully meets requirements.

The Outcome of Moderation

After the process, schools receive:

  • Final moderated marks for each student.
  • A moderation report summarizing accuracy and reliability.
  • Recommendations for future improvements.

If the school’s marks align closely with IB standards, minimal or no adjustment is made — confirming strong internal assessment practices.

Conclusion

External moderation is one of the IB’s most valuable quality-assurance tools. It guarantees that MYP assessments remain fair, consistent, and globally credible, while supporting teachers in refining their craft.

By aligning tasks with IB criteria, maintaining clear evidence, and reflecting on feedback, schools and students can approach moderation confidently — ensuring that every grade awarded truly reflects the IB’s global standard of excellence.

Join 350k+ Students Already Crushing Their Exams