Many IB Global Politics students lose marks not because they lack knowledge, but because they make avoidable essay mistakes. Examiners consistently report that essays often show understanding of content but fail to meet assessment criteria due to weak structure, poor focus, or lack of evaluation. Knowing these common mistakes is one of the fastest ways to improve results.
One of the most frequent mistakes is not answering the question directly. Students often write everything they know about a topic instead of addressing the specific wording of the question. This leads to irrelevant content and weak focus. High-scoring essays stay tightly linked to the command term and key concept throughout. Every paragraph should clearly help answer the question.
Another major issue is descriptive writing instead of analytical writing. Many essays explain what happened in a case study without analysing why it matters or how it supports an argument. Description alone does not demonstrate understanding of global politics concepts. Analysis requires linking examples to ideas such as power, sovereignty, legitimacy, or justice and explaining significance.
Lack of evaluation is another common problem. Essays often present one-sided arguments without weighing strengths and weaknesses or considering alternative perspectives. IB Global Politics rewards balanced judgement, not certainty. Evaluation can include limitations of a theory, weaknesses of a policy, or reasons why an argument may not apply in all contexts.
Poor use of case studies also limits marks. Some students use too many examples briefly, while others rely on one case without depth. Case studies should be relevant, accurate, and used analytically. They are evidence for arguments, not stories. A smaller number of well-developed case studies is more effective than many superficial ones.
Weak essay structure is another frequent issue. Essays without clear introductions, topic sentences, or conclusions are difficult to follow. Examiners should be able to identify the argument quickly. A strong structure helps show clarity of thought and ensures marks are awarded across all criteria.
Another mistake is misusing key concepts or theories. Some students force concepts into essays even when they are not relevant. Others define concepts incorrectly or too vaguely. Concepts should be applied precisely and meaningfully. Quality of application matters more than quantity.
Time management also affects essay quality. Students may rush conclusions or leave evaluation undeveloped. Practising timed essays helps avoid this. Planning before writing is essential to avoid rambling or unfinished arguments.
Finally, some students adopt an overly absolute tone, making sweeping claims without qualification. Global politics is complex, and examiners reward nuance. Words such as “always” or “never” are rarely appropriate. Acknowledging complexity strengthens credibility.
For IB Global Politics students, avoiding these mistakes can significantly improve essay performance. High-level essays are focused, analytical, evaluative, and clearly structured. Improving technique is often more important than learning more content.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the biggest mistake in IB Global Politics essays?
Not answering the question directly. Irrelevant content reduces marks quickly. Staying focused is essential.
How can I avoid being too descriptive?
Always explain why an example matters. Link it to concepts and the question. Ask yourself “so what?” after each point.
How important is evaluation?
Evaluation is essential for top marks. Essays without judgement are capped. Balance and critique strengthen responses.
Can good knowledge compensate for poor structure?
No. Poor structure makes it hard for examiners to reward marks. Clear organisation is critical.
How can I improve quickly?
Review markbands, practise timed essays, and focus on structure and evaluation. Fixing technique leads to rapid improvement.
